This new Code section immediately ran into a complication from a much older law, Sec. While the vast majority of individuals are cash-method taxpayers, many businesses operate on the accrual method.
Accrual-method businesses can deduct expenses as they are incurred, but cash-method individuals do not recognize income until actually received. As such, an interest payment from an accrual-method business to its individual owner that is not paid, merely accrued, would be deducted by the business, but would not be income to the owner until it is paid. At first it would appear the old law, Sec. However, since Sec.
Because Sec. It effects this result by deeming the interest to be original issue discount. In turn, some relief is provided to the accrual-method borrower, who may now claim a deduction to the extent the related cash-method lender is required to recognize the income. Unfortunately, when both the owner and the business are cash-method taxpayers, and Sec. If no interest is actually paid, Sec. However, since the borrower in this case is cash method, it cannot deduct the related interest expense until paid.
The resulting dichotomy of treatment can cause basis differences for book and tax purposes, as well as between the lender and borrower. If the relevant AFR rate for calculating the prescribed Sec. So, for tax and book purposes the business's debt has different basis that needs to be considered when payments are finally made.
Likewise, if both shareholder and corporation are cash-method taxpayers and payments are not made, the debtor and lender will have different tax basis in the debt. In this situation the lender, required to recognize income not yet received, would have a higher basis than the borrower of the debt. These differences need to be carefully tracked by each party for recognizing income and expenses when payments are made at a later date.
Another complication for self-charged interest involves the net investment income tax under Sec. As interest income, even though not actually received, the mandated income recognition under Sec. Fortunately, Regs.
In addition, understanding when related-party rules may change the tax treatment of a debtor or creditor helps to ensure appropriate planning takes place to avoid unknown tax liabilities. When a creditor is a cash-basis taxpayer, the taxability of "accrued interest" depends on whether the interest is truly accrued but unpaid interest or, alternatively, PIK interest. Where a debt instrument includes qualified stated interest QSI interest at a stated rate unconditionally payable in cash or property other than additional debt instruments of the debtor payable at least annually at a single fixed rate, such interest accrues during the debt instrument's accrual period e.
Further, if the debtor is unable to make the QSI payments in cash or property, such interest will accrue as unpaid interest and will most likely be subject to a higher penalty interest rate. In both instances, the cash-basis creditor is not required to recognize the accrued but unpaid interest in income due to the application of the cash method of accounting i.
The answer for a cash-basis taxpayer changes significantly where the note calls for PIK interest. PIK interest accrues during the applicable accrual period and is then "paid in kind" through either the issuance of additional debt instruments or an increase in the principal of the existing debt. Under these rules, a creditor is required to report the appropriate PIK interest as income in the current year, regardless of its method of accounting.
Therefore, a cash method creditor holding a PIK note is required to include current interest into income regardless of when it receives cash payment. To some, this may come as an unwelcome surprise. For example, private equity PE firms often structure their investments in a portfolio with a mix of debt and equity, resulting in a situation where the PE firm owns in excess of 50 percent of the portfolio P and is also a creditor. Many PE investors and other non-tax professionals operate under a misconception that related-party rules serve to defer interest deductions on related-party debts until such interest is paid in cash.
If not corrected early, this misconception can lead to unknown tax liabilities for debt holders. The first four of these accruals are simple. Economic performance can only occur upon the payment of these expenditures. The recurring item exception does not apply. However, the recurring item exception can be applied if the election has been made and the payment for any of these four expenses has been made within the earlier of 8.
The entities falling under the EisnerAmper brand are independently owned and are not liable for the services provided by any other entity providing services under the EisnerAmper brand. Skip to nav Skip to content. Explore Knowledge Center. Three qualifications need to be met before deductibility can be achieved: All events have occurred that established the fact of the liability. The amount of the liability calculation is reasonably accurate.
Economic performance has occurred. The Amount of The Liability Calculation Is Reasonably Accurate An exact measure of the liability is not necessary, if a reasonably accurate amount can be determined. Economic Performance Has Occurred While items one and two are more straight forward, item three can be more complicated.
Accrued Services Economic performance for services occurs as those services are provided. Accrued Compensation Wages, Bonus, Vacation and Severance When it comes to accrued compensation, meaning compensation paid after year-end, the deduction of those expenses is included under the deferred compensation rules.
0コメント